Outstanding Features

Only medieval cathedral with three spires, was once the only fortress cathedral with a surrounding moat and is now a Victorian Gothic Revival building. A significant pilgrimage centre from early times. Has the best-kept Early Medieval stonework sculpture in Europe. Has a very early Gospels. Cells off the Lady Chapel might have been for anchorites. The chapel has 16th-century hand-painted Flemish glasswork. There is an extraordinary foundation to the second cathedral, probably built by King Offa. Once had the most sumptuous shrine in medieval England. Suffered three Civil War sieges, including a heavy bombardment. Has associations with Kings Henry III and Richard II. Only one of two cathedrals located on the same site as the original church.

Dates.

First Bishop of Mercia in 656. First Bishop of Lichfield in 669. Pilgrimage began 672, 1353 years ago. 8th century shrine tower. Second cathedral, possibly 8th century. Gothic Cathedral built c. 1210 to c.1340. Civil War destruction, 1643-6. Extensive rebuild and repair, 1854-1908. Chad was buried on 2 March 672 (1353 years ago); Bede wrote he administered the diocese in great holiness of life.

Saturday, 1 November 2025

Anchorites at Lichfield

Summary. Three chambers on the south side of the Lady Chapel are enigmatic. They were built by Bishop Walter de Langton who, with the following two bishops, had an interest in anchoritism. Their layout with an external door fits this hypothesis. Location within the Close fortified walls suggest the occupancy of an anchorite priest and managed communion. It is most likely an anchorite was connected to the cathedral in the 13th and early 14th century.

An anchorite or anchoress was someone who withdrew from the community to lead a solitary, prayerful and ascetic (anachoretic) life. Earliest anchoritism was a form of monasticism and included men like John-the-Baptist and Anthony living in the Egyptian desert in the 3rd century. In Benedict of Nursia’s Rule of Saint Benedict, 516, anchoritic life stood for the highest form of monasticism. There are features of the life of Chad which suggest he practiced solitude and gave spiritual advice to those who visited him. In England, the first recorded religious recluses were in the 10th century.[1] Between the 13th to 16th centuries anchorites and various kinds of solitaries, hermits and recluses were very common in England and throughout medieval Europe. Reformation ended this vision of how life has to be lived.

Century

Female

Male

Gender unknown

Total

Total known sites

12th

48

30

18

96

77

13th

123

37

38

198

175

14th

96

41

77

214

171

15th

110

66

28

204

139

16th

37

27

4

68

49

Number of documented anchorites, A. K. Warren, 1985,.[2] There have been 780 recorded English recluses from 601 sites between 1100 and the end of the Middle Ages. They were 414 female solitaries, 201 males and 165 of unknown gender. It appears there were more anchoresses than anchorites (4:1 in the 13th-century). A dearth of records however, suggests there could have been substantially more.[3]

An anchorite usually lived permanently[4] enclosed in a cell known as an anchorhold; that is, they were anchored to one cell. Some anchorites moved freely between several cells and some were in houses. An anchorhold was usually attached to a church or cathedral and often located on the north side. Some were connected to houses and castles or castle walls and some were near monasteries. The anchorite house at Chester-le-Street had four cells and was exceptional. Generally, the cell was small (an average of 4 metres square), contained a bed, a chamber pot and a small altar, but rarely had a window. Commonly, those against a church had a squint or opening to view the altar thus enabling the anchorite to view the raising of the host in the Eucharist. Often the cell was adjoined to another room in which a servant could assist the anchorite especially in providing a frugal meal. Sometimes local people would converse with the anchorite through a small opening in the wall. The anchorite was seen as a wise person able to offer spiritual guidance. Indeed, many who chose to be immured were of high status and were respected. Many had financial security; it was common for wills to contain donations for the local anchorite. The anchorite was independent of the church, but answerable to the bishop. Early anchorholds were predominantly in rural areas and in makeshift timber buildings, but by the 14th century they were in stone houses. By the 16th century anchorholds had become ‘an integral element of the ecclesiastical topography of medieval towns.’[5]

 

View of anchorite's cell at Holy Trinity Church, Skipton, Yorkshire, Wikipedia Public Domain.  


      

The enclosure of an anchoress by a bishop. 15th-century illumination from a Pontifical manuscript, Corpus Christi College, Cambridge MS 79. Fol. 72r. 

The anchorite often held their isolation to be a way to avoid hell and by intense prayer to join Christ.[6] It was like being perpetually in Lent, that is, avoiding temptation and preparing for death. Unlike hermits, anchorites received a rite of consecration that resembled a funeral before entering their anchorhold. They would be held as gone from the world, a living saint. During the late medieval period it was often a pious, lay woman. Some had terminal diseases and this was a positive way to see their end-life and enact a form of martyrdom. There is some evidence of when they died, they were buried within the apse of the church near to the altar. 13 English guides giving instruction are known which explain how anchorites were to be made, supported and behave. There were four key ideals: enclosure, comparative solitude, chastity and orthodoxy[7] Therefore their common portrayal as a solitary, unstable, unkept and heretical individual is wrong. Some anchorites suffered, but this most likely applied only to a minority. Some anchorite-priests pursued scholarly or copyist work in their cells. Ælfheah, c.953‑1012, was an anchorite at Bath who became an abbot, then a bishop and finally Archbishop of Canterbury. He became a saint in 1078.

 A well-known anchorite was Cuthbert isolated on Farne island and described by Bede. Another was Billfrith at Lindisfarne who adorned the Lindisfarne Gospels with gold and gems. In the late 7th century, Guthlac left the monastery in Repton and for 15 to 20 years lived on an island in the Lincolnshire Fens. A folklore story has Chad living as a hermit and living on the milk of a doe. This myth has been modified to locate the hermitage at Stowe. Wigbald might have been an anchorite who attested a charter, 786/96, at Medeshamstead. Wulfric of Haselburyc.1080‑1154. Wulfric was an anchorite priest in Wiltshire and Somerset and frequently advised King Stephen. He lived in a cell adjacent to the church at Haselbury Plucknett, Somerset for 29 years reading the Bible and healing those who visited him. Despite these often-quoted narratives, recent research has emphasised not much is known how the anchorite lived and practised their vocation. Instead, the evidence points to anchoritism as being highly esteemed by the surrounding community, a community which, after all, enabled the vocation to exist and persist in both economic and practical terms.[8]

 

Anchorholds have been identified in churches in Staffordshire and Shropshire. There is a mention of Simon, a longstanding hermit, being translated in 1222 from Lichfield to Dunstable, but he could have been isolating in a cave, house or cell and not attached to a church.[9] Two hermits were allowed by Matilda to settle a mile to the south of Beaudesert (at Radmoor?) and were given land for pasture on Cannock Chase early in the 12th century. In the register of Bishop Walter Langton, in 1311, Emma Sprenghose was found suitable to be an anchoress in a house close to St George’s chapel, Shrewsbury. In 1315, Iseult de Hungerford was admitted into the same house. The house was said to have other anchorites.[10] The register of Bishop Roger de Northburgh, 1322–1358, included appointments of anchorite-priests being made 1357–1374,[11] though it is not clear where the anchorite-priests were sent. In 1360, the prior of Maxstoke was commissioned by Bishop Stretton to enclose Brother Roger de Henorebarwe as an anchorite in the chapel of Maryhall. In 1363, Bishop Stretton inducted a friar at St. John's, Chester, into an anchorite's cell in the churchyard.[12] In 1423, John Grace an anchorite friar from Coventry, preached on three days to the canons in the Cathedral Close.[13] John Woodcoat, a chaplain, in 1457, was asked to hear the confessions of an anchorite at Polesworth.[14] The River Anker runs through Polesworth and its name is said to derive from two anchorholds close-by. In 1509, the bishop suffragan shut up Joan Hythe, a nun from Derby, in a cell at the church in Macclesfield.[15]


View of Savage Chapel attached to St Michael and All Angels’ Church, Macclesfied. Joan Hythe was enclosed in the upstairs room and communicated via the small window to the outside. Internally she could look down though slits in a wall to the ground floor Savage Chapel. She was known as ‘the holy woman’.        

                                                                Squint in the Savage Chapel, now blocked, to see the main altar. . 

An anchorhold with an aumbry in the wall, seems to have existed on the northern side of St. Chad's chancel at Stafford.[16] The inference is medieval Lichfield bishops were supportive of anchoritism.

          Almost certainly in the 13th or 14th-century there must have been anchorites in cells adjoining the cathedral or in the Close, but there is no documentary evidence. The involvement of bishops of Lichfield in the 14th and 15th centuries in anchoritism, especially Bishop Walter Langton, supports this. It raises the question, where were the cells? One good possibility are the three small chambers on the south side of the Lady Chapel built by Bishop Langton. The cells are small and in line sight with the altar in the Lady Chapel. All three chambers are 1.7 m (5 feet 9 inches) wide internally. The eastern and western chambers are shorter (2. 6 m or 8 feet 8 inches long) and the middle chamber is longer (3.9 m or 13 feet long). The roofs are groined with stone ribs and bosses. The middle chamber has a small door to the eastern chamber; it passes –through a buttress and is 1 m (3 feet 3 inches) thick. This chamber was once accessible to the outside by a door.



John Snape’s map 1781 has an engraving of the cathedral and appears to show a path leading from the eastern chamber door. The path appears to extend to outside the south door where a ferry could take visitors across Minster Pool. This avoids entrance through the southeast door, which would have been guarded and used by the bishop.


Lady Chapel From south showing unrestored window tracery, tomb recesses and exterior door. Note the  door and pathway. 1850-1880



 


Lady Chapel watercolour by J. C. Buckler c.1845 clearly showing an external door.

It has been thought the chambers were built for the tomb of Walter de Langton the originator and funder of the chapel, but he was buried on the south side near the high altar. Madisson conjectured whether the chambers were originally sacristies or had a tomb intention, but then admitted their purpose was open to question.[17] He also pointed out the usual practice of a Lady Chapel being seen as a separate building sometimes entered through a low arch and cited 7 other cathedrals. Cox[18] suggested various priests who might have been buried within the chambers. He also surmised whether they were chantry chapels but comes to no conclusion. After Reformation the ‘little cells in the wall of the Lady Chapel may have been occupied by the ecclesiastics who watched the shrine.’[19] The chambers have clearly teased historians; the chambers being tombs has to account for the undercroft and its use and why Langton was not buried in one.


South side of Lady Chapel in Dugdale Monasticum Anglicanum Vol 6 part 3, pages 1238–9. Note the access door for the eastern most chamber. Note changes of access within chambers; the 1989 version appears to be different regarding internal doorways whereas the 1891 is more accurate. Under the three chambers is an undercroft roofed by a pointed tunnel vault.


Exterior of third chamber showing the new stone where there was a door. Note the slit window to the undercroft. Was there a stoup on the ledge inside the archway?

 

A plausible purpose for the exceptional chambers would be for an anchorite, especially an anchorite-priest. Such a solitary could have occupied the middle chamber with welfare provided from the western chamber. Visitors wanting spiritual guidance could not enter the cathedral by the main doors, but would access an anchorite-priest by the small door into the eastern chamber. Perhaps, the anchorite-priest was one of a team of acolytes on a rota. The undercroft could have been for sleeping and sanitation. This means any citizen could access a priest through a wall opening without entering the main body of the cathedral.

Doorway from middle chamber to eastern chamber (now a storeroom).

      

Doorway looking from the undercroft. It is narrow and on the northwest corner of the westernmost chamber.


View of the undercroft. The walls are on the bedrock, and the roof shape is conical. The small room is partly divided by a buttress.


        

A pipe-like opening in the wall of the undercroft. Might this once have been a flue? Thanks to Neil Platts for images of the undercroft.

            There was an anchorage adjoining Chichester Cathedral in which William Bolle, rector of Aldrington, obtained permission to construct a cell and retire thither.  It was agreed that after his death it should pass into the bishop’s hands.  The chamber, 29 x 24 feet, communicated with the Lady chapel. Worcester cathedral had a cell on the north side, between the porch and the west end. At Sherborne Abbey the anchorite was in the chapel of St Mary le Bow on the south side of the Lady chapel. At Durham the chamber was within the cathedral. It was a loft, evidently a wooden structure, close to the high altar and behind St Cuthbert’s shrine. The Westminster anchorage was on the south side of the chancel of St Margaret’s.[20]

 

          It would be unlikely for the name of any anchorite-priest to appear in any Dean and Chapter document since the appointment was entirely the work of the bishop. Furthermore, the anchorite would be considered separate from any cathedral or diocesan arrangement. This helps to explain the obscurity of these individuals and why more is known from the architecture of their cell. The existence of three chambers, an undercroft and external door built by Bishop Langton, the lack of information as to their purpose and their location near the town gate or southern ferry points to their possible use for anchoritism. Also, the known enthusiasm for anchoritism by the following two bishops, Northburgh and Stretton, points to this explanation. The cathedral having an anchorite priest would compete with the Friary and its monks tending to the residents of Lichfield. An anchorite-priest would be able to say Mass, and pray for the souls of brethren and benefactors. They would be akin to a chaplain.



[1] T. Licence, Hermits and Recluses in English Society, 950–1200, (Oxford: 2011). Also, T Licence, ‘Evidence of recluses in eleventh-century England’, in M Godden and S Keynes (eds), Anglo-Saxon England, (2007),36.

[2] A. K. Warren, Anchorites and their Patrons in Medieval England. (Oakland: 1985).

[3] E. A. Jones, Hermits and anchorites in England, 1200–1550. (Manchester: 2019), 7.

[4] There are known examples where the anchorite left or was removed.

[5] R Gilchrist, Contemplation and Action: The Other Monasticism, (Leicester: 1995), 183.

[6] Ibid, A cell of enclosure was equated with prison into which the anchorite propelled himself for fear of hell and for love of Christ.

[7] M. Hughes-Edwards, Reading Medieval Anchoritism, (Cardiff:2012).

[8] Ibid.

[9] R. M. Clay, The Hermits and Anchorites of England. (London: 1914). 142.

[10] J. B. Huges, The episcopate of Walter Langton, Bishop of Coventry and Lichfield, 1296-1321, with a calendar of his register. Ph.D. Thesis for the University of Nottingham, 1992, 684, 697.

[11] Ibid, 24. Also E. Hobhouse ed. Registers of Roger de Norbury, Bishop of Lichfield and Coventry, from 1322 to 1358, William Salt Archaeological Society, (1880), 286.

[12] Ibid, 156.

[13] W. Beresford, Diocesan histories. Lichfield. (London: 1883), 154. Also T. Harwood, The history and antiquities of the church and city of Lichfield. (London: 1806), 285.

[14] Ibid W. Beresford (1883),168

[15] Ibid 162

[16] Ibid 162

[17] J. Maddison, ‘Building at Lichfield Cathedral during the episcopate of Walter Langton, 1296–1321.’ In Medieval archaeology and architecture at Lichfield, XIII, The British Archaeological Association, (1993), 71.

[18] J. C. Cox, ‘The mortuary chapels of Lichfield Cathedral,’ Journal of the Derbyshire Archaeological and Natural History Society, (1879), 1, 116–126.

[19] Ibid 190

[20] R.M. Clay (1914), 80‑1. See note 9.


Wednesday, 1 October 2025

Three conjectures on the early churches

Summary. Scant early documentary evidence for the first and second cathedrals has inevitably led to speculation and wild conjecture. Two hypotheses are given which have warped our understanding of the first cathedral and a third which arises out of recent archaeological investigation.

Raising conjectures has been an interest of early historians, particularly in the late-19th century. Conjectures always have some logic, but remain ideas under empirical evidence is found.

1.     The earliest churches were built on St Michael’s hill.

Diuma, the first Bishop of Mercia died in c. 658 and the next priest (he might not have been made bishop), Coellach, lasted a few months before being removed by King Wulfhere. The next two bishops were more favourable to the Mercian people and it is presumed they now had a church within the Lichfield (Licetfelda) area, but where?

Sculptures of the first four bishops around the northwest entrance door. From the left, Diuma who was Irish, Coellach who was Irish or Scottish and is without a mitre and staff suggesting he was never formally installed, Trumhere who was English and from Ingethling (Gilling)[1] monastery, near Richmond, Yorkshire, and Jaruman, possibly Irish, who, according to the Victorian sculptors, holds the first church with a date around 666. All four bishops were acquainted with the monasteries at Lindisfarne and Iona.

 

Savage posed the question, ‘Why did Jaruman (this should be Trumhere the third Bishop of Mercia) build his church in Lichfield’ and then speculated the location as being on St Michael’s hill.[2] He cited a copy of an anonymous manuscript held in the cathedral archive (its provenance is unclear) called, ‘History of the church of Lichfield’ and dated 1575.[3] This told the legend of Romans (Savage stated it could have been the heathen Angles) slaying a thousand Christians and burying them in what is now St Michael’s churchyard. The cemetery was said to have been consecrated by Augustine, ‘The Apostle of the English’. Savage added it was ‘the tribal burying ground of the Mercians’. Evidence of an Early Medieval[4] crouched burial was revealed when excavations were made for a new vestry for the church in 1978, suggesting an earlier history to the site. Gould and Gould[5] wrote cautiously, perhaps it had early medieval origins. This tentatively points to a Roman/Early Medieval cemetery and presumably a church on the wooded hill and fits with the idea of the first churches being constructed of timber and on high, prominent ground.[6]

          If true, why did the church for Chad move across the marshy, wooded area, now Lichfield town centre, to the hillock on which now stands the cathedral? Two reasons are presented; firstly, it was nearer the stream or river for baptism and sanitation and secondly, it was on a flat Mercian sandstone outcrop lined east to west in which stone was readily available. Also, nearby clay from the stream bank could be used to mix with the clay, dry in the sun, and construct walls. It might also be that King Wulfhere and Bishop Wilfrid knew this site was spiritually untainted, unlike the Anglo-Saxon pagan burial ground.[7] It was superior topographically, practically and spiritually.

2.     The first church was said to have been built in the year 700. Was this a misunderstanding with a shrine tower around Chad’s grave.

It has been a long-standing myth that the first church was built by Bishop Headda around the year 700. This ignores Stephen of Ripon’s statement and Bede’s assertion of a church for St Chad when he arrived in 669.[8] Yet, there is an authoritative statement, “The first church definitely known to have stood on the site of the present cathedral was that built by Bishop Headda and consecrated in December 700.”[9] This unambiguous statement given in the Victoria County History, 1970, without any reference somehow has prevailed? It appears to be premised on Bede stating he was buried near the church of St Mary and then further confused by the belief from the 13th century that his burial was near the ‘monastery’ or ‘House of St Chad’ 700 m north-east of the cathedral by the east end of Stowe pool at a place called Stowe.[10] The website of St Chad’s church states there was a Christian community on this site in the 7th century. All this comes from a narrative of Lastingham monastery, Yorkshire, where Chad was the abbot before being Bishop of Mercia. From this it was taken the first cathedral came later than Chad and was built in the time of Bishop Headda’s episcopate.  

Headda holding the first cathedral; it looks like Escomb Church, Durham. The statue is on the sedilia on the side facing the north sanctuary aisle.

 

This narrative was recorded in the 14th century from a text that is wholly unreliable. The text was in the Chronicon Lichfeldense, since lost, but copied in Warton’s, Anglia Sacra – see note 3.[11]  The writer, thought to be Alan de Assheborn, wrote a very fanciful early history of Britain and added bits of Lichfield’s history to exemplify his ideas. The discovery of Chad’s grave at the east end of the nave in 2003[12] completely contradicts this medieval story. Chad was not buried at Stowe.





Nave excavation 2003 showing the position of Chad’s grave. The grave is marked in red, a foundation to a shrine tower in blue and the midline of the cathedral in yellow.

So why did medieval writers believe there was a first church on the cathedral site, but 30 years later than Chad? Maybe they saw the foundation of the shrine tower when retrieving Chad’s relics around the time of building the current cathedral, early 13th century. They noted the foundation, but did not notice the grave. They presumed the foundation was the first cathedral. Its wall size, around 1 m thick, indicated a date of around the beginning of the 8th century. Perhaps, they saw this foundation earlier since a King Edgar silver penny was found in a pit during the 2003 excavation and was dated to the 10th century.



King Edgar silver penny. Obverse has +EADGAR RE around a small cross pattée within an inner circle. Reverse has INGEL-RI for the moneyer Ingelrics based at Derby. He minted coins showing a rosette and with MO in the field which means money, coin or die and is a feature of Mercian mints. Little is known on this moneyer which makes it unusual. Thanks to Dane Kurth of wildwinds.com.

The two records of Stephen of Ripon’s biography of Bishop Wilfrid and Bede’s history book are relatively clear the first church was built around 667‑9 when Bishop Wilfrid joined King Wulfhere to provide a site for the new ecclesiastical centre of the kingdom of Mercia. It would be odd that Chad, who had been the Bishop of Northumbria for three years based at Lindisfarne, arrives at Licetfelda and does not have a church-cathedral. Medieval and Victorian writers chose to ignore this and later writers never questioned the notion.

3.     The second cathedral would have had a tower for keeping treasure and had sections to separate worshippers, king and clergy. Its nave extended into the current cathedral nave, and was slightly narrower.

A massive foundation for the second cathedral was revealed in 1854 under the choir and presbytery floor.[13] It has been argued with some evidence it is Early Medieval and is best seen as being built by King Offa for his archbishopric, but until it is carbon-dated this remains speculative.[14]

 

Plan of the second cathedral and abutting rectangular chamber superimposed on the plan for the current cathedral.

If it was the east end of Offa’s basilical cathedral, what would the rest of this cathedral, particularly the west front, look like? There are few cathedral foundations existing for the late 8th century to give guidance. However, in 2003 at the east end of the nave a very early wall on the inside of the nave columns indicated an earlier nave. Rodwell (2004) described it as a late Saxon or Norman nave wall foundation.11 It could also have been the nave of Offa’s second cathedral. If so, it was slightly narrower than the current nave.


Stone wall (red) on inside of columns. It had very little masonry. It was a mortared construction using mixed rubble which has a similarity to the basilical foundation in the choir and presbytery.

 






It has been argued the church was similar in time and structure to Brixworth, Northamptonshire.[15] The west end of this church has undergone much change, but some detail is known, so if it is used as a model, remembering Offa attended both churches, then it is possible to guess what the second cathedral looked like.

 

Imagined Offa’s second cathedral using Brixworth as a guide.



Externally, might the second cathedral have looked like this? 







Or this? Chad’s shrine tower would stand alone away from the west end,

 

One reason for having a tower was to securely hold the treasures and artefacts of the cathedral. With Lichfield that could have included everything found in the Staffordshire Hoard.[16] It could also have had a secure meeting room. This was also the time churches were sectioned internally to serve various functions. The nave could have had procession, the king and family might have sat separated from others, perhaps in the presbytery/choir area, and the clergy would be in the apse. The altar could have been in the presbytery. The church is now a line from the public entrance at the west end to the high altar and clergy at the east end. The three arches separated the secular from the sacred areas.

 See also the posts, 'Chad, fantasy folklore and maybe'.


[1] Bede, Historia Ecclesiastica Gentis Anglorum. J. McClure and R. Collins, The Ecclesiastical History of the English People, (Oxford: 2008) 132.

[2] H. E. Savage, The church heritage at Lichfield, St Chad’s Day address 1914. Unpub. Article held in the cathedral library, 3. J. Britton, The history and antiquities of the See and Cathedral Church of Lichfield. (London: 1820), 24, referred to William Dugdale knowing of a document that claimed Jaruman had a church in the Close in 666.

[3] It is difficult to know the origin of this reference. It is said to be a copy made by Canon Whitlock made in 1569 of a previous lost ‘Chronicle’ manuscript. It is likely the story was taken from the ‘Book of Alan of Ashbourne, Vicar of Lichfield’ written in the 1320s, which has been lost, but a copy was made by Canon Thomas Chesterfield, mid-15th century and then repeated by H. Wharton, Anglia Sacra, (London: 1691). The manuscripts are in the British Museum and Bodleian Library, Oxford.

[4] Early Medieval has replaced the term Anglo-Saxon

[5] J. Gould and D. Gould, ‘St Michael’s churchyard, Lichfield’, Trans, South Staffs. Archaeological and Historical Society, (1975), 16, 58‑61.

[6] William of Malmesbury wrote, ‘Lichfield was a tiny village in the midst of a woody district on the banks of a brook’, William of Malmesbury’s ‘De Gesta Pontificum Anglorum’, written early in the 12th century (Hamilton 1870, 307).

[7] See the post, ‘Reasons why Lichfield (Licitfelda) had approval.’

[8] See the posts, ‘Wulfhere and Wilfrid, and later Bede, name Lichfield’ and ‘Wilfrid founder of church of Mercia.’

[9] M. W. Greenslade and R. B. Pugh, House of secular canons - Lichfield cathedral: To the Reformation, A History of the County of Stafford: Volume 3. Originally published by Victoria County History, London, 1970, 140‑166.

[10] It has been suggested the location of Stowe was more likely to be at the west end of Stowe pool. It cannot be assumed it is where his well and 13century church are now located.

[11] Originally it was titled ‘The book of Alan de Assheborn, Vicar of Lichfield’ and dated in 1320s. Alan of Ashbourne wrote a tangled history full of fabled beliefs from c.1323 until his death in 1334.

[12] W. Rodwell, ‘Archaeological excavation in the nave of Lichfield Cathedral’, (unpublished report held in Lichfield Cathedral Library 2003) 1–17.

[13] See the post, ‘The incomparable apse of the second cathedral.’

[14] See the post, ‘Why the second cathedral must be Early Medieval.

[15] See the post, ‘Second cathedral has a short perch layout. It is Early Medieval.’

[16] See the post, ‘It has to be the Lichfield Hoard.’