HISTORY

FEATURES OF THE CATHEDRAL: Only medieval cathedral with 3 spires, fortifications and a moat. Pilgrimage centre from early times. Has a sculpted stone; the best kept Anglo-Saxon stonework in Europe. Has an early Gospels. Has an extraordinary foundation to the second cathedral probably built by King Offa. Once had the most sumptuous shrine in medieval England. Suffered 3 ferocious Civil War sieges resulting in its destruction.

Dates.

DATES. First Bishop of Mercia - 656. First Bishop of Lichfield and Cathedral - 669. Shrine Tower - 8th century. Second cathedral - date to be determined. Third Cathedral - early 13th-century to 14th century. Civil War destruction 1643-1646. Extensive rebuild - 1854-1897. Worship on this site started in 669, 1355 years ago.

Sunday 25 April 2021

Was this an early settlement in Lichfield

     A plot of known Anglo-Saxon settlements on the map of England shows a frontier line running north-south along the Trent washlands of south-west Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire. There are many settlements to the east of this line and very few to the west, Catholme is exceptional. Yet coins and graves have been found west of the line. This suggests in the 6th and early 7th century Lichfield would have been on a marginal border and the inhabitants pioneer colonists. 

Majority of early Saxon settlements are east of the line. By the late Saxon period, settlements are on a line close to the River Severn. By 850–1050, settlements and coins have been found close to the current Welsh border.

     Several reasons for this invisibility of settlements in the West Midlands have been given. Perhaps, by the beginning of the 7th century people had not migrated across middle England and settled. Perhaps, their dwellings were unlike the timber buildings of the east (post, post in trench and sunken featured buildings) and they left no trace in any excavation; instead, they were erecting turf, cobble or loose stone and rubble buildings. Did they prefer to move around in temporary buildings (including tents) which could be dismantled and moved on? Have soil stains, ground depressions, floors and even stake holes not survived so well in the wetter, western climate? It has been argued settlement patterns were largely a consequence of environmental factors, such as the influence of climate, soils and hydrology, and of the patterns of contact and communication engendered by natural topography.[1] The drier east was more conducive to survival. It is therefore no surprise for a paucity of excavated early Anglo-Saxon settlements in the West Midlands and particularly around Lichfield.

     Before a two-storey car park was built on Cross Keys Road, an excavation was conducted at the end of 2005 and into 2006. Two remarkable buildings were found. The north end of a two-chambered building was uncovered around a rectangular pit around 0.4 m deep. Walls contained Roman masonry with yellow mortar attached and bonded together with boulder clay. A twig in the mortar was carbon dated to 89–334. The floor contained rye and wheat grains and there were traces of barley, small mammals and fish bones. A twig in this detritus was carbon dated to 436–636. Charcoal was also found dated to 604–683. Mud plaster on the walls, 10 mm thick, suggested it was possibly a dwelling. The grains suggested it might have become a store and the charcoal hints it was destroyed by fire.

 

Cross Keys excavation site

    On its south side was a 7th to 8th century timber building around a new pit and cut deeper into the ground. Post-holes suggested a dwelling similar to those found at Catholme, but larger. Supporting posts were in the corners and along the middle line of the building. Wattle and daub looked to have been used for infill. A twig found near the wattle was dated to 688–868. 

The upper building is 5th to 6th century, or even later, but has stones with Roman plaster. The lower building is 7th to 8th century.

     Sargent[2]  using notes from the archaeologist,[3] described the early building as unique in Britain. Being stone built and mud plastered suggested a monastic cell, however, the position of the putative doorway, little wear of the floor and its sunken pit does not entirely fit. Sargent compared it with the sunken crypt at Repton and even the possibility it was a funerary mausoleum. It might have pre-dated the early church. Sargent reappraises the many conjectures on how the polyfocal area of Lichfield grew from early times. He noted[4] that  early to mid-Anglo-Saxon pottery sherds, 5th to 9th centuries, were found during excavation of a site to the north of Sandford Street  supporting an early medieval occupation around the northern end of Bird Street.[5]


NB. There is a problem with naming the people Saxon or Anglo-Saxon (the preferred title in academic publications). Based on surviving texts, early inhabitants of the region were commonly called englisc and angelcynn. From 410 A.D. when the Romans left to shortly after 1066, the term only appears three times in legal charters in the entire corpus of Old English literature and all in the tenth century. It is used here because Anglo-Saxon is understood.

[1] T. Williamson, Environment, Society and Landscape in early medieval England: Time and Topography. (Woodbridge: 2015).

[2] A. Sargent, ‘Early medieval Lichfield. A reassessment’. Staffordshire Archaeological and Historical Society Transactions, (2013), 1–32.

[3] N. Tavener, Cross Keys Car Park, Lichfield, Staffordshire. Level 3 archive report on an archaeological excavation and watching brief. (unpub. report, Nick Tavener Archaeological Services) (2010).

[4] See Sargent (2013), 5.

[5] K. Nichol and  S. K. Rátkai, Archaeological Excavations on the North Side of Sandford Street, Lichfield, Staffordshire, 2000 (unpub.report, Birmingham University Field Archaeology Unit) (2002), 14.

Thursday 15 April 2021

East-west alignment

             One of the first observations made by visitors looking along the cathedral is it is not straight. The nave to the central tower and transepts appears not to be the same alignment as the tower along the choir to the east end chapel. It has a 2o kink. The explanation can only be a defect in the building and a consequence of constructing in sections at different times in the 13th-century.

            The cathedral is also out-of-line on an east-west axis. Robert Plot stated the cathedral declined by 27 degrees from the true points.[1] He gave several curious theories why churches should face due east and why there was a declination.[2]

 

View of cathedral from Google Maps.

     There is a general understanding that all churches face directly east. Many do not, especially where space is restricted; their orientation accords with the surroundings. Savage thought the strongly marked ancient boundary could not have been enlarged and this restriction of space effectually barred any rebuilding of the cathedral on a much larger scale.[3] He also noted the cathedral was built with ‘a marked swerve northward,’ and claimed this was compelled by the line of the ledge of rock on which the foundations were laid.[4]

             There is no evidence cathedrals and churches were orientated to face the point where the sun arose on the feast day of the patronal figure, in Lichfield’s case March 2 the death day of Chad. Benson thought it was in line of sunrise on St Peter’s Day, 1 August, in the 12th-century. Neither was it the case of facing when the sun rose on an equinox or a solstice day. There is no way the cathedral could have been satisfactorily aligned to face Jerusalem. However, east was held to be where earthly paradise lies; Jesus was believed to have ascended into heaven east of where the disciples were standing.[5] Christians are buried facing eastwards, so to arise before Christ when he comes again. Consequently, the high altar is at the east end and that is where the daily and weekly services were held from the time of the Norman Conquest in most churches and from early in the first (presumably) and second cathedral at Lichfield. In the current cathedral mass was celebrated at the high altar which meant the public worshippers would only hear it behind the pulpitum or choir screen. There is no evidence of an altar on the west, nave side of the pulpitum. This continued until the Victorian restoration of the cathedral starting in the 1850s.

            There are many graves in the Close which are not strictly facing east.

[1] R. Plot, The Natural History of Staffordshire, (Oxford: 1686), 362–9. Plot justified the east as being significant by citing various events from the Bible, mostly Old Testament. He believed the church should have faced the equinox rise of the sun, but had a blemish, p367. He thought Bishop Roger Clinton was to blame. He concluded the declination from the precise east was not essential for devotion, p368. Other churches not precisely facing eastwards were mentioned, p369.

[2] Remarked on by R. Willis, ‘On foundations of early buildings recently discovered in Lichfield Cathedral’, The Archaeological Journal, (1861), 18, 3.

[3] H. E. Savage, The fourteenth century builders, Unpub. article in the cathedral library, (1916), 18.

[4] Ibid, 20

[5] N. Orme, Going to Church in Medieval England, (Yale: 2021), 93.