HISTORY

FEATURES: Only medieval cathedral with three spires, remains of fortifications and once having a wet moat. Significant pilgrimage centre from early times. Owns the best kept sculpted Anglo-Saxon stonework in Europe. Has early 8th century Gospels. Extraordinary foundation remains to the second cathedral were probably built by King Offa. Once had the most sumptuous shrine in medieval England. Suffered three Civil War sieges resulting in considerable destruction.

Dates.

DATES. 656, first Bishop of Mercia. 669, first Bishop of Lichfield. 8th century shrine tower. Second cathedral could be 8th century, but needs determining. Third Gothic Cathedral, early 13th to 14th century. 1643 to 46, Civil War destruction. Extensive rebuild and refashioned, 1854-1908. Worship on this site started in 669, 1355 years ago.

Sunday, 25 April 2021

Was this an early settlement in Lichfield

     Abstract.  An archaeological dig at Cross Keys in 2005-6 revealed two early buildings, one possibly 7th century and another perhaps 8th century. They indicate an early settlement in Lichfield and a little distance from the cathedral.

    A plot of known Anglo-Saxon settlements on the map of England shows a frontier line running north-south along the Trent washlands of south-west Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire. There are many settlements to the east of this line and very few to the west, Catholme is exceptional. Yet coins and graves have been found west of the line. This suggests in the 6th and early 7th century Lichfield would have been on a marginal border and the inhabitants pioneer colonists. 

Majority of early Saxon settlements are east of the line. By the late Saxon period, settlements are on a line close to the River Severn. By 850–1050, settlements and coins have been found close to the current Welsh border.

     Several reasons for this invisibility of settlements in the West Midlands have been given. Perhaps, by the beginning of the 7th century people had not migrated across middle England and settled. Perhaps, their dwellings were unlike the timber buildings of the east (post, post in trench and sunken featured buildings) and they left no trace in any excavation; instead, they were erecting turf, cobble or loose stone and rubble buildings. Did they prefer to move around in temporary buildings (including tents) which could be dismantled and moved on? Have soil stains, ground depressions, floors and even stake holes not survived so well in the wetter, western climate? It has been argued settlement patterns were largely a consequence of environmental factors, such as the influence of climate, soils and hydrology, and of the patterns of contact and communication engendered by natural topography.[1] The drier east was more conducive to survival. It is therefore no surprise for a paucity of excavated early Anglo-Saxon settlements in the West Midlands and particularly around Lichfield.

     Before a two-storey car park was built on Cross Keys Road, an excavation was conducted at the end of 2005 and into 2006. Two remarkable buildings were found. The north end of a two-chambered building was uncovered around a rectangular pit around 0.4 m deep. Walls contained Roman masonry with yellow mortar attached and bonded together with boulder clay. A twig in the mortar was carbon dated to 89–334. The floor contained rye and wheat grains and there were traces of barley, small mammals and fish bones. A twig in this detritus was carbon dated to 436–636. Charcoal was also found dated to 604–683. Mud plaster on the walls, 10 mm thick, suggested it was possibly a dwelling. The grains suggested it might have become a store and the charcoal hints it was destroyed by fire.

 

Cross Keys excavation site

    On its south side was a 7th to 8th century timber building around a new pit and cut deeper into the ground. Post-holes suggested a dwelling similar to those found at Catholme, but larger. Supporting posts were in the corners and along the middle line of the building. Wattle and daub looked to have been used for infill. A twig found near the wattle was dated to 688–868. 

The upper building is 5th to 6th century, or even later, but has stones with Roman plaster. The lower building is 7th to 8th century.

     Sargent[2]  using notes from the archaeologist,[3] described the early building as unique in Britain. Being stone built and mud plastered suggested a monastic cell, however, the position of the putative doorway, little wear of the floor and its sunken pit does not entirely fit. Sargent compared it with the sunken crypt at Repton and even the possibility it was a funerary mausoleum. It might have pre-dated the early church. Sargent reappraises the many conjectures on how the polyfocal area of Lichfield grew from early times. He noted[4] that  early to mid-Anglo-Saxon pottery sherds, 5th to 9th centuries, were found during excavation of a site to the north of Sandford Street  supporting an early medieval occupation around the northern end of Bird Street.[5]


NB. There is a problem with naming the people Saxon or Anglo-Saxon (the preferred title in academic publications). Based on surviving texts, early inhabitants of the region were commonly called englisc and angelcynn. From 410 A.D. when the Romans left to shortly after 1066, the term only appears three times in legal charters in the entire corpus of Old English literature and all in the tenth century. It is used here because Anglo-Saxon is understood.

[1] T. Williamson, Environment, Society and Landscape in early medieval England: Time and Topography. (Woodbridge: 2015).

[2] A. Sargent, ‘Early medieval Lichfield. A reassessment’. Staffordshire Archaeological and Historical Society Transactions, (2013), 1–32.

[3] N. Tavener, Cross Keys Car Park, Lichfield, Staffordshire. Level 3 archive report on an archaeological excavation and watching brief. (unpub. report, Nick Tavener Archaeological Services) (2010).

[4] See Sargent (2013), 5.

[5] K. Nichol and  S. K. Rátkai, Archaeological Excavations on the North Side of Sandford Street, Lichfield, Staffordshire, 2000 (unpub.report, Birmingham University Field Archaeology Unit) (2002), 14.

No comments:

Post a Comment