Three conjectures on the early churches.
Summary. Scant early documentary evidence for the first
and second cathedrals has inevitably led to speculation and wild conjecture.
Two hypotheses are given which have warped our understanding of the first
cathedral and a third which arises out of recent archaeological investigation.
Raising conjectures has been an
interest of early historians, particularly in the late-19th century.
Conjectures always have some logic, but remain ideas under empirical evidence
is found.
1.
The earliest churches
were built on St Michael’s hill.
Diuma, the first Bishop of Mercia
died in c. 658 and the next priest (he might not have been made bishop),
Coellach, lasted a few months before being removed by King Wulfhere. The next
two bishops were more favourable to the Mercian people and it is presumed they
now had a church within the Lichfield (Licetfelda) area, but where?
Sculptures of the first four bishops around the northwest entrance door. From the left, Diuma who was Irish, Coellach who was Irish or Scottish and is without a mitre and staff suggesting he was never formally installed, Trumhere who was English and from Ingethling (Gilling)[1] monastery, near Richmond, Yorkshire, and Jaruman, possibly Irish, who, according to the Victorian sculptors, holds the first church with a date around 666. All four bishops were acquainted with the monasteries at Lindisfarne and Iona.
Savage posed the question, ‘Why did Jaruman (this
should be Trumhere the third Bishop of Mercia) build his church in Lichfield’
and then speculated the location as being on St Michael’s hill.[2]
He cited a copy of an anonymous manuscript held in the cathedral archive (its
provenance is unclear) called, ‘History of the church of Lichfield’ and dated
1575.[3]
This told the legend of Romans (Savage stated it could have been the heathen
Angles) slaying a thousand Christians and burying them in what is now St
Michael’s churchyard. The cemetery was said to have been consecrated by
Augustine, ‘The Apostle of the English’. Savage added it was ‘the tribal
burying ground of the Mercians’. Evidence of an Early Medieval[4]
crouched burial was revealed when excavations were made for a new vestry for
the church in 1978, suggesting an earlier history to the site. Gould and Gould[5]
wrote cautiously, perhaps it had early medieval origins. This tentatively points
to a Roman/Early Medieval cemetery and presumably a church on the wooded hill
and fits with the idea of the first churches being constructed of timber and on
high, prominent ground.[6]
If true, why did the church for Chad
move across the marshy, wooded area, now Lichfield town centre, to the hillock
on which now stands the cathedral? Two reasons are presented; firstly, it was
nearer the stream or river for baptism and sanitation and secondly, it was on a
flat Mercian sandstone outcrop lined east to west in which stone was readily
available. Also, nearby clay from the stream bank could be used to mix with the
clay, dry in the sun, and construct walls. It might also be that King Wulfhere
and Bishop Wilfrid knew this site was spiritually untainted, unlike the
Anglo-Saxon pagan burial ground.[7]
It was superior topographically, practically and spiritually.
2.
The first church was said
to have been built in the year 700. Was this a misunderstanding with a shrine
tower around Chad’s grave.
It has been a long-standing myth
that the first church was built by Bishop Headda around the year 700. This
ignores Stephen of Ripon’s statement and Bede’s assertion of a church for St
Chad when he arrived in 669.[8]
Yet, there is an authoritative statement, “The first church definitely known to
have stood on the site of the present cathedral was that built by
Bishop Headda and consecrated in December 700.”[9] This
unambiguous statement given in the Victoria County History, 1970, without any reference
somehow has prevailed? It appears to be premised on Bede stating he was buried
near the church of St Mary and then further confused by the belief from the 13th
century that his burial was near the ‘monastery’ or ‘House of St Chad’ 700 m
north-east of the cathedral by the east end of Stowe pool at a place called
Stowe.[10] The
website of St Chad’s church states there was a Christian community on this site
in the 7th century. All this comes from a narrative of Lastingham monastery,
Yorkshire, where Chad was the abbot before being Bishop of Mercia. From this it
was taken the first cathedral came later than Chad and was built in the time of
Bishop Headda’s episcopate.
Headda
holding the first cathedral; it looks like Escomb Church, Durham. The statue is
on the sedilia on the side facing the north sanctuary aisle.
This narrative was recorded in the
14th century from a text that is wholly unreliable. The text was in the Chronicon
Lichfeldense, since lost, but copied in Warton’s, Anglia Sacra – see
note 3.[11]
The writer, thought to be Alan de
Assheborn, wrote a very fanciful early history of Britain and added bits of
Lichfield’s history to exemplify his ideas. The discovery of Chad’s grave at
the east end of the nave in 2003[12] completely
contradicts this medieval story. Chad was not buried at Stowe.
Nave
excavation 2003 showing the position of Chad’s grave. The grave is marked in
red, a foundation to a shrine tower in blue and the midline of the cathedral in
yellow.
So why did medieval writers
believe there was a first church on the cathedral site, but 30 years later than
Chad? Maybe they saw the foundation of the shrine tower when retrieving Chad’s
relics around the time of building the current cathedral, early 13th century.
They noted the foundation, but did not notice the grave. They presumed the
foundation was the first cathedral. Its wall size, around 1 m thick, indicated
a date of around the beginning of the 8th century. Perhaps, they saw this
foundation earlier since a King Edgar silver penny was found in a pit during
the 2003 excavation and was dated to the 10th century.
King Edgar silver penny. Obverse has +EADGAR RE around
a small cross pattée within an inner circle. Reverse has INGEL-RI for the
moneyer Ingelrics based at Derby. He minted coins showing a rosette and with MO
in the field which means money, coin or die and is a feature of Mercian mints.
Little is known on this moneyer which makes it unusual. Thanks to Dane Kurth of
wildwinds.com.
The two records of Stephen of Ripon’s biography of Bishop Wilfrid and Bede’s history book are relatively clear the first church was built around 667‑9 when Bishop Wilfrid joined King Wulfhere to provide a site for the new ecclesiastical centre of the kingdom of Mercia. It would be odd that Chad, who had been the Bishop of Northumbria for three years based at Lindisfarne, arrives at Licetfelda and does not have a church-cathedral. Medieval and Victorian writers chose to ignore this and later writers never questioned the notion.
3.
The second cathedral
would have had a tower for keeping treasure and had sections to separate
worshippers, king and clergy. Its nave extended into the current cathedral
nave, and was slightly narrower.
A massive foundation for the
second cathedral was revealed in 1854 under the choir and presbytery floor.[13]
It has been argued with some evidence it is Early Medieval and is best seen as
being built by King Offa for his archbishopric, but until it is carbon-dated
this remains speculative.[14]
Plan of the second
cathedral and abutting rectangular chamber superimposed on the plan for the
current cathedral.
If it
was the east end of Offa’s basilical cathedral, what would the rest of this
cathedral, particularly the west front, look like? There are few cathedral
foundations existing for the late 8th century to give guidance. However, in
2003 at the east end of the nave a very early wall on the inside of the nave
columns indicated an earlier nave. Rodwell (2004) described it as a late Saxon
or Norman nave wall foundation.11 It could also have been the nave
of Offa’s second cathedral. If so, it was slightly narrower than the current
nave.
Stone wall
(red) on inside of columns. It had very little masonry. It was a mortared
construction using mixed rubble which has a similarity to the basilical
foundation in the choir and presbytery.
It has been argued the church was similar in time and structure
to Brixworth, Northamptonshire.[15]
The west end of this church has undergone much change, but some detail is known,
so if it is used as a model, remembering Offa attended both churches, then it
is possible to guess what the second cathedral looked like.
Imagined
Offa’s second cathedral using Brixworth as a guide.
Externally,
might the second cathedral have looked like this?
Or this?
Chad’s shrine tower would stand alone away from the west end,
One reason for having a tower was to securely hold the
treasures and artefacts of the cathedral. With Lichfield that could have
included everything found in the Staffordshire Hoard.[16]
It could also have had a secure meeting room. This was also the time churches
were sectioned internally to serve various functions. The nave could have had
procession, the king and family might have sat separated from others, perhaps
in the presbytery/choir area, and the clergy would be in the apse. The altar
could have been in the presbytery. The church is now a line from the public
entrance at the west end to the high altar and clergy at the east end. The
three arches separated the secular from the sacred areas.
[1]
Bede, Historia Ecclesiastica Gentis Anglorum. J. McClure and R. Collins,
The Ecclesiastical History of the English People, (Oxford: 2008) 132.
[2]
H. E. Savage, The church heritage at Lichfield, St Chad’s Day address
1914. Unpub. Article held in the cathedral library, 3. J. Britton, The
history and antiquities of the See and Cathedral Church of Lichfield. (London:
1820), 24, referred to William Dugdale knowing of a document that claimed
Jaruman had a church in the Close in 666.
[3]
It is difficult to know the origin of this reference. It is said to be a copy
made by Canon Whitlock made in 1569 of a previous lost ‘Chronicle’ manuscript.
It is likely the story was taken from the ‘Book of Alan of Ashbourne, Vicar of
Lichfield’ written in the 1320s, which has been lost, but a copy was made by
Canon Thomas Chesterfield, mid-15th century and then repeated by H. Wharton, Anglia
Sacra, (London: 1691). The manuscripts are in the British Museum and
Bodleian Library, Oxford.
[4]
Early Medieval has replaced the term Anglo-Saxon
[5]
J. Gould and D. Gould, ‘St Michael’s churchyard, Lichfield’, Trans, South
Staffs. Archaeological and Historical Society, (1975), 16, 58‑61.
[6]
William of Malmesbury wrote, ‘Lichfield was a tiny village in the midst of a
woody district on the banks of a brook’, William of Malmesbury’s ‘De Gesta
Pontificum Anglorum’, written early in the 12th century (Hamilton 1870, 307).
[7]
See the post, ‘Reasons why Lichfield (Licitfelda) had approval.’
[8]
See the posts, ‘Wulfhere and Wilfrid, and later Bede, name Lichfield’ and ‘Wilfrid
founder of church of Mercia.’
[9]
M. W. Greenslade and R. B. Pugh, House of secular canons - Lichfield
cathedral: To the Reformation, A History of the County of Stafford: Volume
3. Originally published by Victoria County History, London, 1970, 140‑166.
[10]
It has been suggested the location of Stowe was more likely to be at the west
end of Stowe pool. It cannot be assumed it is where his well and 13century
church are now located.
[11]
Originally it was titled ‘The book of Alan de Assheborn, Vicar of Lichfield’
and dated in 1320s. Alan of Ashbourne wrote a tangled history full of fabled
beliefs from c.1323 until his death in 1334.
[12]
W. Rodwell, ‘Archaeological excavation in the nave of Lichfield Cathedral’, (unpublished
report held in Lichfield Cathedral Library 2003) 1–17.
[13]
See the post, ‘The incomparable apse of the second cathedral.’
[14]
See the post, ‘Why the second cathedral must be Early Medieval.
[15]
See the post, ‘Second cathedral has a short perch layout. It is Early Medieval.’
[16]
See the post, ‘It has to be the Lichfield Hoard.’